by Elisabeth NationsIn Chapter 13, Lende discusses the neuroanthropological view of drug addiction, emphasizing that addiction is the result of a complexity of intertwined biological and socio-cultural factors. Lende clarifies that his definition of addiction is the desire to use drugs and the repetition of drug use. In the past, American society has typically defined drug addiction either as a disease where a person is unable to make rational choices or as a moral failing due to the inability to resist pleasure. Lende argues instead that incentive salience, a biological phenomenon triggered by social factors, plays a major role in drug addiction. Incentive salience as it pertains to drug addiction means that an individual with an overly sensitive mesolimbic dopamine system wants drugs “too much.” This wanting isn’t a conscious decision, but rather a desire that operates subcortically and brings a sense of intense urgency; for example, in a typical sequence of events, a drug user decides they want to take drugs, and then they experience an increasing, emphatic urgency to obtain and take those drugs. Since incentive salience motivates the individual to do what they most want, this can vary greatly between people and even throughout the course of the day. The concept of incentive salience does help to explain certain patterns of drug addiction. For example, an adolescent who becomes addicted to drugs might be doing so because there are little to no rewards for working hard at school or spending time with his family (perhaps if the individual lives in a low-income area with an abusive family). The incentives offered by using, like belonging to a group of other users and experiencing an “escape” from daily life, motivate the incentive salience system, and the individual is increasingly drawn to engage in this rewarding activity.
Drug addiction begins with an individual’s pursuit of pleasure and reward, but as time goes on and drug use is repeated and increased, its association with the brain changes. Neural activation by drugs moves from an individual’s ventral stratium to the dorsal stratium, where drug-seeking is then maintained and made into a habit. After this, the habit of drug use isn’t affected by reward as much, and a person is unable to make much of an evaluation of the consequences of his actions. Continual exposure to drugs makes habitual use easier and more likely, as does stress. This chapter was at times difficult to read, mostly because I felt confused about how the different neurological concepts fit together. Although it seems clear that Lende is attempting to argue that environmental factors play a large role in drug addiction, I feel that he did not spend enough time discussing these factors. In particular, what cultural or social factors might lead a person to use drugs in the first place, and why might that person return to drugs over time, other than because of a neurological pull to do so? Overall, though, I thought Lende explained the concept of incentive salience and its connection to the attraction to repeated drug use well, and I certainly felt that I gained a better understanding of drug addiction by reading this chapter.
6 Comments
Zach Obaji
4/16/2019 08:09:43 pm
Elisabeth, I enjoyed reading your blog post on the “Addiction and Neuroanthropology” chapter. I have always been fascinated by learning about addiction and substance abuse, and this topic interests me greatly. I agree that Lende could have been a little more concrete when discussing how social and cultural factors affect addiction rates. In my opinion, I do not believe that researchers have genuinely understood the complex mechanisms associated with addiction. I brainstormed a few reasons as to why addiction occurs in the first place. First, I thought that social status could influence addiction rates. While this could be a factor, it is essential to remember that addiction does not discriminate. In other words, addiction is a powerful disease that can completely dominate and re-wire the brain regardless of social status. I do believe that addiction is still largely taboo in our society, and this ignorance has neglected us from understanding the progression of addiction from a societal and biological approach.
Reply
Vanessa Marshall
4/16/2019 09:50:07 pm
I really appreciated how you synthesized the incentive salience idea into a really cohesive paragraph. This idea is new to me, and I don't know much about addiction, so this chapter was rather eye opening. Previously, I was "aware" that common ideas of drug addiction were outdated, but I hadn't realize how much I subscribed to those ideas and how little I was aware of the newer research documenting what addiction really is. I had no idea that addiction changed to habit, or that this change was associated with different areas of the brain. Really looking forward to this discussion and hearing what everyone has to say. I am still a bit confused by how cached models and incentive salience work together
Reply
Brian Rivera
4/17/2019 07:43:12 am
I feel the book is trying to mediate between two limiting aspects of research: the limitation of studies with small homogenous groups (sometimes even different species) in controlled laboratory setting and the dynamics of cross-cultural and transnational studies. I think Lende incorporated these two aspects of research incredibly well in this insightful chapter. It gave a great context to understand addiction highlighting much of what is known and pointing at how much more could be learned.
Reply
Kaitlyn May
4/17/2019 02:18:12 pm
I also really enjoyed this chapter. I found myself asking how neuroscience could inform anthropology when studying addiction, and as well, how can anthropology inform neuroscience when studying addiction? I wonder how neuroscience could contribute to the cultural aspect of the addiction stigma. Your review documents the neural underpinnings of addiction well, but I don't feel that the general public looks to these ideas when judging addiction, like Vanessa said. I'm curious whether providing people with this knowledge would somehow affect societal misconceptions about addiction, or it wouldn't. The closest example that comes to mind is vaccines and fake news-- regardless of the credible information provided to people, people continue to cling to alternative sources of information.
Reply
Kaitlyn May
4/24/2019 08:10:29 pm
This chapter really challenged my thinking because it dealt with topics that are not typically part of my repertoire. It's interesting to consider how social status might affect propensity to drug addiction. Like Zach said in the comments, addiction does not discriminate and can affect anyone from any walk of life. Like Elisabeth said, the chapter was difficult to follow. For that reason, it's still hard for me to accept this topic without hesitancy.
Reply
8/31/2021 05:17:00 am
i like this article about Neuroanthropology, i has a lot of info it's the first time to know it, thanks for sharing
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorThis blog is group authored by Dr. DeCaro and the students in his ANT 474/574: Neuroanthropology. Archives
April 2019
Categories |